<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huh?</title>
	<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/</link>
	<description>A perfume blog about all things perfume - reviews, shopping, recommendations.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BOP News - Blog on Perfume News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Make your own Unique Perfume</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-32943</link>
		<dc:creator>BOP News - Blog on Perfume News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Make your own Unique Perfume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 11:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-32943</guid>
		<description>[...] Aromascope led me to a website called DNA Fragrance, which - for $114.98 - will take a swab of your DNA from inside your mouth, then will base a new fragrance around your DNA. They promise it won&#8217;t smell bad, and it&#8217;s not a pheramone. A few of the commenters on the Aromascope comments remain skeptical, including SniffQ: If you read the privacy policy, you’ll notice that they SEEM to protect you, but can, according to their own policy, submit your DNA to the the master health insurance bureau or the CIA, or, for that matter, the police. And while they tell you they will protect it, the Homeland Security rules now in place say that any DNA sample have to be turned over when asked for. Naaahhh, I’ll find my own perfumes. This just creeps me out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Aromascope led me to a website called DNA Fragrance, which - for $114.98 - will take a swab of your DNA from inside your mouth, then will base a new fragrance around your DNA. They promise it won&#8217;t smell bad, and it&#8217;s not a pheramone. A few of the commenters on the Aromascope comments remain skeptical, including SniffQ: If you read the privacy policy, you’ll notice that they SEEM to protect you, but can, according to their own policy, submit your DNA to the the master health insurance bureau or the CIA, or, for that matter, the police. And while they tell you they will protect it, the Homeland Security rules now in place say that any DNA sample have to be turned over when asked for. Naaahhh, I’ll find my own perfumes. This just creeps me out. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-30088</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 02:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-30088</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't worry they can get are dna from any public place. I think it's a good idea, now i don't have to walk into a room and smell like some every one else. There website is very nice one of the best I ever seen. They probably don't tell you how its made because it is a trade secret. I read the  press release on there site it eludes to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t worry they can get are dna from any public place. I think it&#8217;s a good idea, now i don&#8217;t have to walk into a room and smell like some every one else. There website is very nice one of the best I ever seen. They probably don&#8217;t tell you how its made because it is a trade secret. I read the  press release on there site it eludes to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29576</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29576</guid>
		<description>Thanks, all, for your input, as always. I must assure you I have no intention of doing it (as desperate as I may be these days). I agree, it's weird and creepy and is most likely a scam of some sort. Meanwhile, I continue in my perfume apathy... Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, all, for your input, as always. I must assure you I have no intention of doing it (as desperate as I may be these days). I agree, it&#8217;s weird and creepy and is most likely a scam of some sort. Meanwhile, I continue in my perfume apathy&#8230; Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SniffQ</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29569</link>
		<dc:creator>SniffQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29569</guid>
		<description>Man, this kind of stuff scares the sh** out of me. OK, so I'm a privacy freak. I'll admit it. 
If you read the privacy policy, you'll notice that they SEEM to protect you, but can, according to their own policy, submit your DNA to the the master health insurance bureau or the CIA, or, for that matter, the police. And while they tell you they will protect it, the Homeland Security rules now in place say that any DNA sample have to be turned over when asked for. Naaahhh, I'll find my own perfumes. This just creeps me out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this kind of stuff scares the sh** out of me. OK, so I&#8217;m a privacy freak. I&#8217;ll admit it.<br />
If you read the privacy policy, you&#8217;ll notice that they SEEM to protect you, but can, according to their own policy, submit your DNA to the the master health insurance bureau or the CIA, or, for that matter, the police. And while they tell you they will protect it, the Homeland Security rules now in place say that any DNA sample have to be turned over when asked for. Naaahhh, I&#8217;ll find my own perfumes. This just creeps me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmp00</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29547</link>
		<dc:creator>tmp00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 15:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29547</guid>
		<description>If they'd just let me spit into a cotton ball and mail it to them for $10 I might think of doing it.  A solid Benjamin, though?  Not a prayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they&#8217;d just let me spit into a cotton ball and mail it to them for $10 I might think of doing it.  A solid Benjamin, though?  Not a prayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Existentialist</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29465</link>
		<dc:creator>Existentialist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29465</guid>
		<description>I guess I am not too thrilled with the idea of sending someone a sample of my DNA.  There was a lot of speculation as to what kinds of nefarious uses that kind of information could be put to, by, say, health insurance companies, potential employers, etc.  And even if I am paranoid, Leopoldo has a good point.  I think I would pass on this.  It would be more fun to go to Memoire Liquide anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I am not too thrilled with the idea of sending someone a sample of my DNA.  There was a lot of speculation as to what kinds of nefarious uses that kind of information could be put to, by, say, health insurance companies, potential employers, etc.  And even if I am paranoid, Leopoldo has a good point.  I think I would pass on this.  It would be more fun to go to Memoire Liquide anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marsha Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29453</link>
		<dc:creator>Marsha Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29453</guid>
		<description>Is anyone sure this is legit?  It sounds like a good old con.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone sure this is legit?  It sounds like a good old con.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leopolodo</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29431</link>
		<dc:creator>Leopolodo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29431</guid>
		<description>Ridiculous, though I'll gladly stump up some of the cash so that you can do it! I think it might end up being a grand ole disappointment though - 
I'm sure everyone gets the same basic fruity-floral with a dibdab of something slightly different...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous, though I&#8217;ll gladly stump up some of the cash so that you can do it! I think it might end up being a grand ole disappointment though -<br />
I&#8217;m sure everyone gets the same basic fruity-floral with a dibdab of something slightly different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tigs</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29354</link>
		<dc:creator>Tigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 05:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29354</guid>
		<description>Okay, that's so ridiculous it made my day.  Thanks for letting us all know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, that&#8217;s so ridiculous it made my day.  Thanks for letting us all know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29328</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 01:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/09/07/huh/#comment-29328</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a shame, squarely aimed at perfume maniacs... don't do it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a shame, squarely aimed at perfume maniacs&#8230; don&#8217;t do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
