<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Shocking Secrets Of Granny’s Boudoir</title>
	<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/</link>
	<description>A perfume blog about all things perfume - reviews, shopping, recommendations.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Solander</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22476</link>
		<dc:creator>Solander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22476</guid>
		<description>Tom - Ah well, tastes differ...

Ina - If you love rose, it's probably worth a try!

Chayaruchama - Always for science. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom - Ah well, tastes differ&#8230;</p>
<p>Ina - If you love rose, it&#8217;s probably worth a try!</p>
<p>Chayaruchama - Always for science. <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chayaruchama</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22320</link>
		<dc:creator>chayaruchama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22320</guid>
		<description>God, it's been YEARS since I snorted this- and I've not 'shelled out' to smell the newer one.
However, if my sexy soulsister Fraulein Dinazad remembers it fondly, then it's likely that I do, too. I'll have to check this out. For science, of COURSE.
Bring on the skank, baby !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, it&#8217;s been YEARS since I snorted this- and I&#8217;ve not &#8217;shelled out&#8217; to smell the newer one.<br />
However, if my sexy soulsister Fraulein Dinazad remembers it fondly, then it&#8217;s likely that I do, too. I&#8217;ll have to check this out. For science, of COURSE.<br />
Bring on the skank, baby !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22267</guid>
		<description>Very interesting! Since I do love the rose, I'm more curious to try this now, in both (or all possible) versions. New lemming alert! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting! Since I do love the rose, I&#8217;m more curious to try this now, in both (or all possible) versions. New lemming alert! <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmp00</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22234</link>
		<dc:creator>tmp00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22234</guid>
		<description>hmmm.. sounds a little disappointing, at least to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm.. sounds a little disappointing, at least to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solander</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22226</link>
		<dc:creator>Solander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22226</guid>
		<description>Oh, I wouldn't say that! Schiaparelli's contemporaries had civet and chypres! Now in the days of fruity florals and sugar,  when everything, even the musk, is supposed to smell "clean", I think we're more shockable perfume-wise. Well, maybe not us perfume nerds and skankaholics... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I wouldn&#8217;t say that! Schiaparelli&#8217;s contemporaries had civet and chypres! Now in the days of fruity florals and sugar,  when everything, even the musk, is supposed to smell &#8220;clean&#8221;, I think we&#8217;re more shockable perfume-wise. Well, maybe not us perfume nerds and skankaholics&#8230; <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dinazad</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22225</link>
		<dc:creator>dinazad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22225</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe we just aren't as shockable as Schiaparelli's contemporaries were?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe we just aren&#8217;t as shockable as Schiaparelli&#8217;s contemporaries were?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solander</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22223</link>
		<dc:creator>Solander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22223</guid>
		<description>Dina - Well, apart from the topnotes, which have not quite stood the test of time, I like the vintage version. I only wish it was more "shocking"... Your description sounds lovely! I wish I got opulence from the reformulation, I like opulent rose scents, but not sharp and soapy ones... 
Tastes change indeed - mine has already changed more than I'd ever think the short time I've been a perfume nerd - so I'll save the vintage version for later. By the way, after a few hours I got some oakmoss from the reformulation too. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to try them!

newproducts - Well, if you like roses, powder and aldehydes you might very well like it! :) Me, I don't mind powder but I've not yet learned to appreciate aldehydes, and I only like a few selected rose scents.

Elle - ooh, skank, wish I got that!

Dmitri - tuberose? That's interesting! I thought it was purely a rose scent.

Marina - More oomph, exactly! More oomph and more skank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dina - Well, apart from the topnotes, which have not quite stood the test of time, I like the vintage version. I only wish it was more &#8220;shocking&#8221;&#8230; Your description sounds lovely! I wish I got opulence from the reformulation, I like opulent rose scents, but not sharp and soapy ones&#8230;<br />
Tastes change indeed - mine has already changed more than I&#8217;d ever think the short time I&#8217;ve been a perfume nerd - so I&#8217;ll save the vintage version for later. By the way, after a few hours I got some oakmoss from the reformulation too. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to try them!</p>
<p>newproducts - Well, if you like roses, powder and aldehydes you might very well like it! <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Me, I don&#8217;t mind powder but I&#8217;ve not yet learned to appreciate aldehydes, and I only like a few selected rose scents.</p>
<p>Elle - ooh, skank, wish I got that!</p>
<p>Dmitri - tuberose? That&#8217;s interesting! I thought it was purely a rose scent.</p>
<p>Marina - More oomph, exactly! More oomph and more skank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22222</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22222</guid>
		<description>Tove, I found nothing shocking in Shocking either :-) I did like the scent, but I wanted more oomph out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tove, I found nothing shocking in Shocking either <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> I did like the scent, but I wanted more oomph out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitri aka Flacon007</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22220</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitri aka Flacon007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22220</guid>
		<description>I just couldn't refrain from a comment to this fragrance.
Sniffing at only one vintage version of Shocking won't give you an vision of what it was. There were many editions of the scent and all of them survived the time in a different way, I 'm afraid. So it would be better to try and sniff at as many vintage samples as possible.
For me Shocking is a tuberose scent in the first line, a source of inspiration for Poison Dior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just couldn&#8217;t refrain from a comment to this fragrance.<br />
Sniffing at only one vintage version of Shocking won&#8217;t give you an vision of what it was. There were many editions of the scent and all of them survived the time in a different way, I &#8216;m afraid. So it would be better to try and sniff at as many vintage samples as possible.<br />
For me Shocking is a tuberose scent in the first line, a source of inspiration for Poison Dior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22219</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 11:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/06/12/the-shocking-secrets-of-granny%e2%80%99s-boudoir/#comment-22219</guid>
		<description>I didn't even know there was a new version.  Must look for it!  I have the vintage in parfum and have to admit I adore it.  Skank, oakmoss, honey and roses - for me, perfection.  :-)  I hope they make the new version in parfum as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t even know there was a new version.  Must look for it!  I have the vintage in parfum and have to admit I adore it.  Skank, oakmoss, honey and roses - for me, perfection.  <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  I hope they make the new version in parfum as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
