<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Musings</title>
	<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/</link>
	<description>A perfume blog about all things perfume - reviews, shopping, recommendations.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aromascope &#187; Angel: Behind The Scenes</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-17211</link>
		<dc:creator>Aromascope &#187; Angel: Behind The Scenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 05:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-17211</guid>
		<description>[...] (I had no idea it even existed!) that looks like a spaceship. In reference to my earlier post on the role of marketing in perfume, when it comes to Angel, I think the marketing approach is simply brilliant and is a huge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (I had no idea it even existed!) that looks like a spaceship. In reference to my earlier post on the role of marketing in perfume, when it comes to Angel, I think the marketing approach is simply brilliant and is a huge [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16947</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 03:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16947</guid>
		<description>Christen, Judith, Greeneyes, Jamie, and Jayne - thank you all for your kind words and input! I'm truly honored to have readers like you. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christen, Judith, Greeneyes, Jamie, and Jayne - thank you all for your kind words and input! I&#8217;m truly honored to have readers like you. <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jayne</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16860</guid>
		<description>As a novice and as someone who has been influenced enormously by blogs, I'd like to add a comment or two.  

I've loved perfume all my life, in a fairly ignorant, uninformed but impassioned way.  I stumbled across blogs, just as Robin suggested, by typing in the name of a perfume I was hesitating over.  I very soon discovered, to my delight (and particular thanks to Patty and March), that I didn't have to go out and buy that very expensive bottle, but I could get a sample or a decant for a fraction of the price.  Responsible bloggers constantly warn about buying unsniffed.  They are decidely not urging us to rush out and buy the latest hot product - the ones who seem to break the rule most consistently are other bloggers. What I got from blogs was incredibly useful, pro-consumer and anti-commercial. 

I'm very new to this world, this community - but I like it.  I think it is full of lovely, genuine people and only the occasional village idiot.  There must be many like me who appreciate you for your wit, warmth, honesty and (on occasion) completely justifiable and understandable bias.  We're talking subjective love, not objective science, here.

As communities grow, guidelines about acceptable behaviour are bound to change and develop.  Without official police, communities need to base their developing codes on consensus and self-regulation. Any accusation needs a calm and reasoned response but witch-hunts are never a good way forward.  Robin is a case in point - she has learned from experience and has adapted her practice and is not afraid to explain herself.  She emerges even more fragrant than before.  (Smelling, I think, of Passage L'Enfer or Avignon - sanctity rather than roses.)

With love</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a novice and as someone who has been influenced enormously by blogs, I&#8217;d like to add a comment or two.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve loved perfume all my life, in a fairly ignorant, uninformed but impassioned way.  I stumbled across blogs, just as Robin suggested, by typing in the name of a perfume I was hesitating over.  I very soon discovered, to my delight (and particular thanks to Patty and March), that I didn&#8217;t have to go out and buy that very expensive bottle, but I could get a sample or a decant for a fraction of the price.  Responsible bloggers constantly warn about buying unsniffed.  They are decidely not urging us to rush out and buy the latest hot product - the ones who seem to break the rule most consistently are other bloggers. What I got from blogs was incredibly useful, pro-consumer and anti-commercial. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m very new to this world, this community - but I like it.  I think it is full of lovely, genuine people and only the occasional village idiot.  There must be many like me who appreciate you for your wit, warmth, honesty and (on occasion) completely justifiable and understandable bias.  We&#8217;re talking subjective love, not objective science, here.</p>
<p>As communities grow, guidelines about acceptable behaviour are bound to change and develop.  Without official police, communities need to base their developing codes on consensus and self-regulation. Any accusation needs a calm and reasoned response but witch-hunts are never a good way forward.  Robin is a case in point - she has learned from experience and has adapted her practice and is not afraid to explain herself.  She emerges even more fragrant than before.  (Smelling, I think, of Passage L&#8217;Enfer or Avignon - sanctity rather than roses.)</p>
<p>With love</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16831</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16831</guid>
		<description>Wow, the milk of human kindness doesn't appear to be flowing in great abundance recently.   Nicole, I really don't understand the hostility.  There have been several CSPs I truly love (the original The remains one of my favorite tea scents ever) and I'm not in the least troubled if other people don't like them. I don't for a second assume they're uninformed snobs.  I assume they have different associations and maybe different skin chemistry.  I also am a huge fan of many CdGs and CB scents and some of the people I love most in the perfume community don't care for them at all.   And that's fine.   It's part of what makes this community so interesting and discussions of perfume so fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the milk of human kindness doesn&#8217;t appear to be flowing in great abundance recently.   Nicole, I really don&#8217;t understand the hostility.  There have been several CSPs I truly love (the original The remains one of my favorite tea scents ever) and I&#8217;m not in the least troubled if other people don&#8217;t like them. I don&#8217;t for a second assume they&#8217;re uninformed snobs.  I assume they have different associations and maybe different skin chemistry.  I also am a huge fan of many CdGs and CB scents and some of the people I love most in the perfume community don&#8217;t care for them at all.   And that&#8217;s fine.   It&#8217;s part of what makes this community so interesting and discussions of perfume so fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16816</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16816</guid>
		<description>Ooops - Add Perfume Smellin Things to my list of favorite blogs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops - Add Perfume Smellin Things to my list of favorite blogs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16815</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 14:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16815</guid>
		<description>I'm a lurker, but I'm going to venture out from my self-imposed "lurkerdom", to offer my 2 cents.  I absolutely love this perfume blog "Aromascope", together with Now Smell this, Boise d Jasmin, Perfume Posse, and Victoria's Own .  I consider myself very fortunate to have tripped over Now Smell This last summer, and I have been hooked to the aforementioned blogs ever since.

I have loved fragrance since I was a young girl (a loooong time ago), and had no idea that there was a whole community out there of others with the same interest.  I have learned so much, and I have discovered the most wonderful, beautiful fragrances through the reviews.  I've also discovered that I love vintage fragrances.   My "black and blue" credit card can attest to that!  :)   The reviews are beautifully written, and very informative, as are the responsive comments.   If I'm interested in a particular fragrance after a review, for the most part, I'll get a small sample or a decant, to see if it's full bottle worthy.  I've got to say, however, that I've purchased one or two bottles, unsniffed, and the reviews were so "spot on", that I was very happy with the purchases.

A conflict of interest never occurred to me, and it still does not.   How are we to discover other fragrances, unless the Bloggers obtain them, sample and review them?   I had never even heard of a "niche house" fragrance - I just knew I liked different, and not something everybody else was wearing.   

No one's twisting our arms to purchase a fragrance because it received a good review, or not to purchase due to a negative review - part of the fun are the samples and the decants anyway.

Keep up the good work - you all brighten my day!

                                                J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a lurker, but I&#8217;m going to venture out from my self-imposed &#8220;lurkerdom&#8221;, to offer my 2 cents.  I absolutely love this perfume blog &#8220;Aromascope&#8221;, together with Now Smell this, Boise d Jasmin, Perfume Posse, and Victoria&#8217;s Own .  I consider myself very fortunate to have tripped over Now Smell This last summer, and I have been hooked to the aforementioned blogs ever since.</p>
<p>I have loved fragrance since I was a young girl (a loooong time ago), and had no idea that there was a whole community out there of others with the same interest.  I have learned so much, and I have discovered the most wonderful, beautiful fragrances through the reviews.  I&#8217;ve also discovered that I love vintage fragrances.   My &#8220;black and blue&#8221; credit card can attest to that!  <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   The reviews are beautifully written, and very informative, as are the responsive comments.   If I&#8217;m interested in a particular fragrance after a review, for the most part, I&#8217;ll get a small sample or a decant, to see if it&#8217;s full bottle worthy.  I&#8217;ve got to say, however, that I&#8217;ve purchased one or two bottles, unsniffed, and the reviews were so &#8220;spot on&#8221;, that I was very happy with the purchases.</p>
<p>A conflict of interest never occurred to me, and it still does not.   How are we to discover other fragrances, unless the Bloggers obtain them, sample and review them?   I had never even heard of a &#8220;niche house&#8221; fragrance - I just knew I liked different, and not something everybody else was wearing.   </p>
<p>No one&#8217;s twisting our arms to purchase a fragrance because it received a good review, or not to purchase due to a negative review - part of the fun are the samples and the decants anyway.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work - you all brighten my day!</p>
<p>                                                J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16806</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 13:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16806</guid>
		<description>Nicole, LOL indeed. It always cracks me up when people use the "LOL" when they're actually making snide or rude remarks. I'm glad you at least find my blog amusing! I must be doing something right.

You're welcome to not read Aromascope, by the way. But you seem to be coming back. LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole, LOL indeed. It always cracks me up when people use the &#8220;LOL&#8221; when they&#8217;re actually making snide or rude remarks. I&#8217;m glad you at least find my blog amusing! I must be doing something right.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re welcome to not read Aromascope, by the way. But you seem to be coming back. LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16795</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 12:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16795</guid>
		<description>Funny how touchy some people are about their favorite lines and scents. Say bad things about their favorites and you are labeled clueless and a snob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how touchy some people are about their favorite lines and scents. Say bad things about their favorites and you are labeled clueless and a snob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16752</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 08:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16752</guid>
		<description>CSP people visiting your blog? You're giving yourself too much credit! LOL!

I wrote this post because you didn't sound like a perfume lover. I wrote it because you sounded like a rather clueless perfume snob. And I used to love your blog.

People trying to 'undermine' your credibility? Again, how exciting! LOL!

Your readers are smart people you know, and we're certainly entitled to question the credibility of perfume blogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSP people visiting your blog? You&#8217;re giving yourself too much credit! LOL!</p>
<p>I wrote this post because you didn&#8217;t sound like a perfume lover. I wrote it because you sounded like a rather clueless perfume snob. And I used to love your blog.</p>
<p>People trying to &#8216;undermine&#8217; your credibility? Again, how exciting! LOL!</p>
<p>Your readers are smart people you know, and we&#8217;re certainly entitled to question the credibility of perfume blogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeram1</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16688</link>
		<dc:creator>zeram1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 02:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/05/07/tuesday-musings/#comment-16688</guid>
		<description>I was concerned about a half a year ago, when on another fragrance talk website, I pointed out that in the directory listing that there was a frequent (and supposedly highly praised by others) reviewer who had made a positive review of a fragrance, that was the exact wording as the advertisement for said fragrance on a commercial website.  Being that said reviewer in question had so many previous reviews on the website, s/he complained to the board's operators, who followed up by editing out my "expose".

So it goes on . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was concerned about a half a year ago, when on another fragrance talk website, I pointed out that in the directory listing that there was a frequent (and supposedly highly praised by others) reviewer who had made a positive review of a fragrance, that was the exact wording as the advertisement for said fragrance on a commercial website.  Being that said reviewer in question had so many previous reviews on the website, s/he complained to the board&#8217;s operators, who followed up by editing out my &#8220;expose&#8221;.</p>
<p>So it goes on . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
