<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perfume Legends by Michael Edwards</title>
	<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/</link>
	<description>A perfume blog about all things perfume - reviews, shopping, recommendations.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 06:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aromascope &#187; Quotes On Classics</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-26156</link>
		<dc:creator>Aromascope &#187; Quotes On Classics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 03:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-26156</guid>
		<description>[...] reading my Perfume Legends book, I came across a few quotes that I consider gems or little odes to some of the classic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] reading my Perfume Legends book, I came across a few quotes that I consider gems or little odes to some of the classic [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: black hot ebony pussy</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-21799</link>
		<dc:creator>black hot ebony pussy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-21799</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;black hot ebony pussy...&lt;/strong&gt;

black hot ebony pussy author...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>black hot ebony pussy&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>black hot ebony pussy author&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aromascope &#187; Tuesday Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-16368</link>
		<dc:creator>Aromascope &#187; Tuesday Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 04:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-16368</guid>
		<description>[...] and instead of forcing myself too much, I want to share a quote I came across while reading my Perfume Legends book. Speaking of writing, there was a discussion yesterday on the fragrance discussion forum I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and instead of forcing myself too much, I want to share a quote I came across while reading my Perfume Legends book. Speaking of writing, there was a discussion yesterday on the fragrance discussion forum I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aromascope &#187; Vintage Closet: Fidji by Guy Laroche</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-14344</link>
		<dc:creator>Aromascope &#187; Vintage Closet: Fidji by Guy Laroche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-14344</guid>
		<description>[...] by Guy Laroche came out in 1966 and, according to Perfume Legends (p. 135), &#8220;pioneered a new generation of fresh perfumes: Norell (1969), Charlie (1973), Gucci [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] by Guy Laroche came out in 1966 and, according to Perfume Legends (p. 135), &#8220;pioneered a new generation of fresh perfumes: Norell (1969), Charlie (1973), Gucci [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aromascope &#187; Rose Angel by Thierry Mugler</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4953</link>
		<dc:creator>Aromascope &#187; Rose Angel by Thierry Mugler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4953</guid>
		<description>[...] It goes without saying, Angel by Thierry Mugler is the Poison of the 90s. Olivier Cresp, its perfumer, intended to create &#8220;a perfume that was also a drug&#8221; (Perfume Legends, p.283). Its ingenious blend of caramel, chocolate, and patchouli has indeed accomplished that. Whether you favor Angel or not, it&#8217;ll be sure to alter your existence simply because you&#8217;re bound to smell it on others, and, once you smell it, you won&#8217;t forget it. My first encounter with the scent happened roughly four years ago when I instantly fell into a state of euphoria - I practically bathed in it, applying several spritzes per day (when one spritz would suffice perfectly). It was truly a drug. However, instead of developing a severe addiction, I actually grew intensely weary of it. Today, I still appreciate the scent but cannot bring myself to wear it. The latest addition to the Angel Garden of Stars collection (Lily Angel, Violet Angel, Peony Angel), Rose Angel is the only rendition I absolutely love and wear on occasion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] It goes without saying, Angel by Thierry Mugler is the Poison of the 90s. Olivier Cresp, its perfumer, intended to create &#8220;a perfume that was also a drug&#8221; (Perfume Legends, p.283). Its ingenious blend of caramel, chocolate, and patchouli has indeed accomplished that. Whether you favor Angel or not, it&#8217;ll be sure to alter your existence simply because you&#8217;re bound to smell it on others, and, once you smell it, you won&#8217;t forget it. My first encounter with the scent happened roughly four years ago when I instantly fell into a state of euphoria - I practically bathed in it, applying several spritzes per day (when one spritz would suffice perfectly). It was truly a drug. However, instead of developing a severe addiction, I actually grew intensely weary of it. Today, I still appreciate the scent but cannot bring myself to wear it. The latest addition to the Angel Garden of Stars collection (Lily Angel, Violet Angel, Peony Angel), Rose Angel is the only rendition I absolutely love and wear on occasion. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4346</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4346</guid>
		<description>Evilpeony (love the name!), I highly recommend you try both Mitsouko and Jicky in parfum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evilpeony (love the name!), I highly recommend you try both Mitsouko and Jicky in parfum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilpeony</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4315</link>
		<dc:creator>evilpeony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4315</guid>
		<description>hi ina! i heart classic guerlains. i tried jicky edp (i think) in bloomingdales and fell in love with it. it's very modern and sophisticated, yet timeless. when i came home with it, the BF did not accuse me of infusing the apartment with "great grand-aunt smell" (He did accuse me of this, however, when I came home with Mitsouko edt sillage... *giggles*) Nevertheless, I'm still infatuated with Mitsouko, but only in EDP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi ina! i heart classic guerlains. i tried jicky edp (i think) in bloomingdales and fell in love with it. it&#8217;s very modern and sophisticated, yet timeless. when i came home with it, the BF did not accuse me of infusing the apartment with &#8220;great grand-aunt smell&#8221; (He did accuse me of this, however, when I came home with Mitsouko edt sillage&#8230; *giggles*) Nevertheless, I&#8217;m still infatuated with Mitsouko, but only in EDP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4292</guid>
		<description>Shifts, Guerlains in parfum are so worth a try. Vast difference. EDPs are generally better versions, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shifts, Guerlains in parfum are so worth a try. Vast difference. EDPs are generally better versions, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>Vika, same here! I have a whole list of scents I need to get samples of to match the book's selection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vika, same here! I have a whole list of scents I need to get samples of to match the book&#8217;s selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.aromascope.com/wp/2007/01/05/perfume-legends-by-michael-edwards/#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>Morgan, thank you! I'm downtown a lot. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgan, thank you! I&#8217;m downtown a lot. <img src='http://www.aromascope.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
